Paul Bowles

104 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Paul Bowles
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Development 167
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 196
  • Political Science and International Relations 421
  • Finance 173
  • Economics and Econometrics 276
Replace Mushtaq Khan with:
Mushtaq Khan United Kingdom
Thandika Mkandawire United Kingdom
Charles Gore United States
Raj M. Desai United States
Susanne Soederberg Canada
Roumeen Islam United States
Thomas J. Biersteker Switzerland
Michael Monteón United States
Erik Wibbels United States
John Toye United Kingdom
Paul Bowles relative to Mushtaq Khan United Kingdom Mushtaq Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Mushtaq Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Bowles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Bowles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Bowles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Bowles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Bowles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Bowles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Bowles. The network helps show where Paul Bowles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Bowles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Bowles Line = papers co-authored together Paul Bowles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000152
2 200294
3 201165
4 201456
5 200255
6 200343
7 201443
8 200838
9 198735
10 200432
11
Globalization and the Welfare State: Four Hypotheses and Some Empirical Evidence
199728
12 199428
13 202127
14 199726
15 201325
16 201924
17 200823
18 199622
19 200221
20 201320

About Paul Bowles

Paul Bowles is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 124 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (13 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (9 papers), Global trade and economics (8 papers), International Development and Aid (7 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (7 papers), Mining and Resource Management (7 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (167 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (196 citations), Political Science and International Relations (421 citations), Finance (173 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (276 citations). Paul Bowles has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Xiao‐yuan Dong, Fiona MacPhail, Henry Veltmeyer, Samuel P. S. Ho, Gordon White, Kyle R. Leeman, Darcy Tetreault, Robert J. Rafka, Norman Girvan and James Petras. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement, Pacific Affairs, The Journal of Development Studies, Review of International Political Economy and Organic Process Research & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact