Paul Booth
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Social Media and Politics
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
Papers in
-
- Digital Games and Media 26
-
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Shira Chess (1 shared paper)D J Hulme (1 shared paper)R. C. Kellaway (1 shared paper)Robert Alan Brookey (1 shared paper)Lucy Bennett (1 shared paper)Naomi Jacobs (1 shared paper)Bethan Jones (1 shared paper)Rebecca Williams (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Media & Society (2 papers)Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (2 papers)Popular Communication (2 papers)Agricultural Systems (1 paper)Communication Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul Booth
34 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Communication 88
- Gender Studies 118
- Cultural Studies 60
- Literature and Literary Theory 72
- Music 17
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Booth. The network helps show where Paul Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Paul Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 37 | |
| 3 | Playing Fans: Negotiating Fandom and Media in the Digital Age | 2015 | 34 |
| 4 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 12 | Digital Fandom 2.0: New Media Studies | 2010 | 12 |
| 13 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 5 |
About Paul Booth
Paul Booth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 36 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (26 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (10 papers), Media Studies and Communication (7 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (6 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (5 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (88 citations), Gender Studies (118 citations), Cultural Studies (60 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (72 citations) and Music (17 citations). Paul Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Shira Chess, D J Hulme, R. C. Kellaway, Robert Alan Brookey, Lucy Bennett, Naomi Jacobs, Bethan Jones and Rebecca Williams. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Popular Communication, Agricultural Systems and Communication Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.