Patrick Toner

540 citations
25 papers · 283 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick Toner

22 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Patrick Toner
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Philosophy 87
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Soil Science 43
  • Geophysics 31
Replace Steffen Ducheyne with:
Steffen Ducheyne Belgium
Dunstan Brown United Kingdom
Kim Taylor United Kingdom
P.J.F. de Swart Netherlands
Emily C. Parke New Zealand
James H. Reynolds United States
John Wishart United Kingdom
Erna Weber
Agnieszka A. Mrowiec United States
Yuling Yao United States
Patrick Toner relative to Steffen Ducheyne Belgium Steffen Ducheyne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Steffen Ducheyne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Toner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Toner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Toner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Toner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Toner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Toner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Toner. The network helps show where Patrick Toner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Toner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Toner Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Toner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201643
2 201336
3 200730
4 201128
5 200727
6 201025
7 201012
8
Personhood and Death in St. Thomas Aquinas
200911
9 201011
10 200910
11 20108
12 20147
13 20127
14 20075
15 20125
16 20105
17 20064
18 20083
19 20113
20 20171

About Patrick Toner

Patrick Toner is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Soil Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations), Philosophy (87 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Soil Science (43 citations) and Geophysics (31 citations). Patrick Toner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. W. Rees, Jean‐Michel Lavoie, T. L. Chow, D. H. Boteler, Sébastien Guillon, Zhipeng Xing, J. L. Daigle and Bernie J. Zebarth. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Analytic Philosophy and International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact