Patrick Pina

1.3k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick Pina

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Patrick Pina
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Biophysics 267
  • Analytical Chemistry 198
  • Clinical Biochemistry 128
  • Molecular Medicine 89
  • Immunology 308
Replace Tom Grunert with:
Tom Grunert Austria
Thomas Emil Andersen Denmark
E. C. Beuvery Netherlands
J.S. Kavanaugh United States
C. Nicole Rosenzweig United States
Peter F. Scholl United States
Snehal Kadam India
Paola Di Matteo Italy
Nobuo Kato Japan
Kai Sohn Germany
Patrick Pina relative to Tom Grunert Austria Tom Grunert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.5×
Tom Grunert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Pina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Pina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Pina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Pina more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Pina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Pina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Pina. The network helps show where Patrick Pina may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Pina, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Pina Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Pina links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995395
2 2001228
3 199773
4
FT-IR spectroscopy as an emerging method for rapid characterization of microorganisms.
199850
5 199746
6 200737
7 200431
8 200027
9 199920
10 199518
11 200517
12 200916
13 199515
14 200315
15 200213
16 200012
17 200811
18 201911
19 200610
20 20038

About Patrick Pina

Patrick Pina is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Molecular Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry, Biophysics and Endocrinology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (8 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (7 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (5 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (5 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (267 citations), Analytical Chemistry (198 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (128 citations), Molecular Medicine (89 citations) and Immunology (308 citations). Patrick Pina has collaborated with scholars based in France, Mexico and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include P. Allouch, Wolf H. Fridman, Marc Daëron, Odile Malbec, Éric Espinosa, Sylvain Latour, Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans, Ganesh Dhruvananda Sockalingum, Michel Manfait and Roger Labia. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs of today, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact