Patrick John Steffanic

1.7k citations
3 papers · 6 · h-index 2

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick John Steffanic

2 papers receiving 6 citations

Peers

Patrick John Steffanic
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
  • Instrumentation 1
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1
  • Artificial Intelligence 2
Replace N. Valls Canudas with:
N. Valls Canudas Spain
J. Niermann Germany
F. Cirotto Italy
S. Auricchio Italy
V. Chekalina Russia
Deborah Duchardt Germany
W. Redjeb Switzerland
S. Rettie Switzerland
Adam Elwood Switzerland
C. Battilana Italy
Patrick John Steffanic relative to N. Valls Canudas Spain N. Valls Canudas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
N. Valls Canudas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick John Steffanic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick John Steffanic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick John Steffanic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick John Steffanic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick John Steffanic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick John Steffanic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick John Steffanic. The network helps show where Patrick John Steffanic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Patrick John Steffanic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick John Steffanic Line = papers co-authored together Patrick John Steffanic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
#Work
1 20234
2 20152
3 20230

About Patrick John Steffanic

Patrick John Steffanic is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 3 papers that have together received 6 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (2 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1 paper), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (1 paper), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (1 paper) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (1 citation), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1 citation), Management Science and Operations Research (1 citation) and Artificial Intelligence (2 citations). Patrick John Steffanic has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Nattrass, Antonio Carlos Oliveira da Silva, Charles Hughes, Gary B. Hughes, Hugh O’Neill, Jonathan Y. Suen, Qicheng Zhang and Peter Meinhold. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. C and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact