Pascal Edrich

13 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

Pascal Edrich
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 344
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 202
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 95
  • Genetics 29
  • Hematology 31
Replace Daniela Mamoli with:
Daniela Mamoli Italy
E.L. Mullens United States
Daniele Grioni Italy
J C Sánchez-Alvarez Spain
C. Arrigo Belgium
J.A. Mauri Spain
Simon Borghs United Kingdom
Marc De Backer Belgium
J Blacklaw United Kingdom
J M Prats Spain
Pascal Edrich relative to Daniela Mamoli Italy Daniela Mamoli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Daniela Mamoli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pascal Edrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pascal Edrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pascal Edrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pascal Edrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pascal Edrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pascal Edrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pascal Edrich. The network helps show where Pascal Edrich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pascal Edrich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pascal Edrich Line = papers co-authored together Pascal Edrich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2001162
2 200366
3 200663
4 200939
5 201031
6 200619
7
Identifying baseline characteristics of placebo responders versus nonresponders in randomized double-blind trials of refractory partial-onset seizures.
200619
8 200618
9 201018
10 20249
11
The komet study: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial comparing the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam with sodium valproate and carbamazepine as monotherapy in subjects with newly diagnosed epilepsy
20085
12 20151
13 20081

About Pascal Edrich

Pascal Edrich is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Neurology and Hematology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (10 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (344 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (202 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (95 citations), Genetics (29 citations) and Hematology (31 citations). Pascal Edrich has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Joyce A. Cramer, Jacqueline A. French, Betty Van Vleymen, Elinor Ben‐Menachem, Bernd Schmidt, Josemir W. Sander, Jing‐Jane Tsai, Der‐Jen Yen, Chi‐Wan Lai and William E. Rosenfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsy Research, Epilepsia, Epileptic Disorders, Epilepsy & Behavior and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact