Pardis Pedram

1.2k citations
21 papers · 898 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Pardis Pedram

20 papers receiving 857 citations

Peers

Pardis Pedram
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Clinical Psychology 320
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 67
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 117
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 139
Replace Deborah Lycett with:
Deborah Lycett United Kingdom
Dvora Shmulewitz United States
Jorien L. Treur Netherlands
Long Zhai China
Chanaka Kahathuduwa United States
Carl Roberts United Kingdom
Danit Nitka Canada
Karen K. Saules United States
Andrea C. Johnson United States
Leslie G. Womble United States
Pardis Pedram relative to Deborah Lycett United Kingdom Deborah Lycett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Deborah Lycett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pardis Pedram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pardis Pedram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pardis Pedram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pardis Pedram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pardis Pedram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pardis Pedram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pardis Pedram. The network helps show where Pardis Pedram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pardis Pedram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pardis Pedram Line = papers co-authored together Pardis Pedram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013260
2 2020177
3 201673
4 201459
5 201658
6 201656
7 201949
8 201244
9 201738
10 201318
11 201717
12 201212
13 20248
14 20218
15 20157
16 20185
17 20244
18 20242
19 20232
20 20131

About Pardis Pedram

Pardis Pedram is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 898 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (3 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (320 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (67 citations), Applied Psychology (44 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (117 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (139 citations). Pardis Pedram has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guang Sun, Wayne Gulliver, Edward Randell, Jeanne V.A. Williams, Andrew G. M. Bulloch, Scott B. Patten, Asmita Bhattarai, Kathryn Wiens, Ashley K. Dores and Guangju Zhai. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Nutrients, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact