Pak‐Kwan Hui

2.4k citations
46 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Pak‐Kwan Hui

46 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Pak‐Kwan Hui
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 726
  • Dermatology 217
  • Oncology 657
  • Immunology 373
  • Genetics 178
Replace James Linder with:
James Linder United States
Dennis P. O’Malley United States
Barbara H. Tindle United States
H. Søgaard Denmark
Arnold B. Gelb United States
Yoichiro Kobashi Japan
José A. Jiménez‐Heffernan Spain
Pascale Levine United States
Nicole Brousse France
D J Pollock United Kingdom
Pak‐Kwan Hui relative to James Linder United States James Linder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
James Linder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pak‐Kwan Hui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pak‐Kwan Hui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pak‐Kwan Hui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pak‐Kwan Hui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pak‐Kwan Hui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pak‐Kwan Hui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pak‐Kwan Hui. The network helps show where Pak‐Kwan Hui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pak‐Kwan Hui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pak‐Kwan Hui Line = papers co-authored together Pak‐Kwan Hui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989155
2 1991152
3 1989132
4 1994110
5 1989109
6 199596
7 198886
8 198865
9 198865
10 201361
11 198958
12 200249
13 198945
14
Application of a T cell receptor antibody beta F1 for immunophenotypic analysis of malignant lymphomas.
198845
15 200542
16 198742
17 199839
18
Columnar cell carcinoma of the thyroid. Fine needle aspiration findings in a case.
199038
19 199137
20 198836

About Pak‐Kwan Hui

Pak‐Kwan Hui is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Dermatology and Immunology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (7 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (7 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (6 papers), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (5 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (5 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (4 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (726 citations), Dermatology (217 citations), Oncology (657 citations), Immunology (373 citations) and Genetics (178 citations). Pak‐Kwan Hui has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C.S. Ng, John Chan, E. Gwi, W.H. Lau, John K. C. Chan, I.T.M. Kung, K. Lennert, John K. C. Chan, Sy Ha and Wing-Yee Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Histopathology, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Pathology, Human Pathology and PROTEOMICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact