Pak Hung Mo
Impact in
-
- Natural Resources and Economic Development
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Taxation and Compliance Studies
- Economic Growth and Productivity
Papers in
-
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 8
- Economic Growth and Productivity 7
-
- Global trade and economics 5
- Economic Theory and Policy 4
Pak Hung Mo
20 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Pak Hung Mo's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 222
- Economics and Econometrics 643
- Information Systems 459
- Sociology and Political Science 770
- Accounting 142
Countries citing papers authored by Pak Hung Mo
This map shows the geographic impact of Pak Hung Mo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pak Hung Mo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pak Hung Mo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pak Hung Mo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pak Hung Mo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pak Hung Mo. The network helps show where Pak Hung Mo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Pak Hung Mo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corruption and Economic Growth Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 921 |
| 2 | 2000 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 10 | Income distribution polarization and economic growth: Channels and effects | 2009 | 4 |
| 11 | The supply-side and demand-side effects of government size and investment | 2008 | 3 |
| 12 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 15 | Institutions, tools variety and channels to sustained economic growth | 2011 | 2 |
| 16 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 17 | Financial liberalization with macro-stability and fiscal revenue: Resolving economic dilemmas in China | 2011 | 1 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Pak Hung Mo
Pak Hung Mo is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Demography, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (222 citations), Economics and Econometrics (643 citations), Information Systems (459 citations), Sociology and Political Science (770 citations) and Accounting (142 citations). Pak Hung Mo has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elissaios Papyrakis and Wing Suen. Their work appears in journals such as Kyklos, Journal of Political Economy, Economic Analysis and Policy, Fiscal Studies and Economic Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.