P. J. King

9.9k citations
69 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

P. J. King

66 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

P. J. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computational Mechanics 554
  • Physiology 118
  • Condensed Matter Physics 213
  • Ocean Engineering 252
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 104
Replace S. Dorbolo with:
S. Dorbolo Belgium
Ko van der Weele Greece
Jih-Chiang Tsai Taiwan
Stephen Warr United Kingdom
В. Г. Козлов Russia
Paul Sánchez United States
Alexander A. Fedorets Russia
J.P. Troadec France
Marc K. Smith United States
François Nadal France
P. J. King relative to S. Dorbolo Belgium S. Dorbolo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
S. Dorbolo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. J. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. J. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. J. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. J. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. J. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. J. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. J. King. The network helps show where P. J. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. J. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. J. King Line = papers co-authored together P. J. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002128
2 199380
3 200372
4 198861
5 200353
6 200352
7 200452
8 200347
9 200741
10 200439
11 199137
12 200537
13 200935
14 201027
15 200527
16 200523
17 200622
18 200720
19 199517
20
Brazil Nuts on Eros: Size-Sorting of Asteroid Regolith
200115

About P. J. King

P. J. King is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (29 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (25 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (12 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (12 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (10 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (9 papers), Landslides and related hazards (7 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (554 citations), Physiology (118 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (213 citations), Ocean Engineering (252 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (104 citations). P. J. King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Swift, R. M. Bowley, Paul Sánchez, L. Eaves, M. C. Leaper, Mark Naylor, Heather Macdonald, Arnd Sturm, Daphne Klotsa and K. A. Benedict. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Europhysics Letters (EPL), Physical Review Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact