P. J. Baum

511 citations
33 papers · 445 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

P. J. Baum

32 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

P. J. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 416
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 224
  • Geophysics 29
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 45
  • Molecular Biology 87
Replace E. N. Parker with:
E. N. Parker Canada
H. J. Völk Germany
S. L. Moses United States
G. Barr United Kingdom
N. Shimada Japan
L. M. Zeleny Russia
C. Slottje Netherlands
T. Gold
Larry W. Brown United States
M. Faganello Italy
P. J. Baum relative to E. N. Parker Canada E. N. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
E. N. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. J. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. J. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. J. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. J. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. J. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. J. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. J. Baum. The network helps show where P. J. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside P. J. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. J. Baum Line = papers co-authored together P. J. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198066
2 198043
3 197337
4 198233
5 197325
6 197725
7 197424
8 197621
9 197319
10 197619
11 197617
12 197816
13
Reconnection of magnetic fields.
198413
14 198611
15 201511
16 197410
17 19797
18 19737
19
Test of a life support system with Hirudo medicinalis in a sounding rocket.
19727
20 19754

About P. J. Baum

P. J. Baum is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (22 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (21 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (15 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (4 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (3 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (416 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (224 citations), Geophysics (29 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (45 citations) and Molecular Biology (87 citations). P. J. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. Bratenahl, R. S. White, Adam Burnett, Peter Scull, Shigeyuki Minami, A. B. Hassam, S. W. Kahler, G. Paschmann, S. W. H. Cowley and B. U. Ö. Sonnerup. Their work appears in journals such as Solar Physics, Journal of Plasma Physics, Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Geography and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact