P. Hohl

26 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

P. Hohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Molecular Medicine 222
  • Pharmacology 252
  • Infectious Diseases 260
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 25
  • Clinical Biochemistry 87
Replace E Huczko with:
E Huczko United States
M. Husson Belgium
Beatrice Minassian United States
C E Fasching United States
Elizabeth Gradelski United States
William J. Ritz United States
Jeffrey R. Aeschlimann United States
C T Eliopoulos United States
Toyoko Oguri Japan
Tetsufumi Koga Japan
P. Hohl relative to E Huczko United States E Huczko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
E Huczko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Hohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Hohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Hohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Hohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Hohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Hohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Hohl. The network helps show where P. Hohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Hohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Hohl Line = papers co-authored together P. Hohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001197
2 200286
3 200250
4 198343
5 199035
6 198833
7 199128
8 198921
9 200416
10 198814
11 199811
12 199011
13 19878
14 19928
15 19928
16 19887
17 19885
18 20075
19 19935
20 19925

About P. Hohl

P. Hohl is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Medicine, Pharmacology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 27 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (12 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (11 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (5 papers), Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (5 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (4 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (4 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (3 papers) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (222 citations), Pharmacology (252 citations), Infectious Diseases (260 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (25 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (87 citations). P. Hohl has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ingrid Heinze‐Krauss, Peter Angehrn, Rudolf Then, Malcolm G. P. Page, Paul Hebeisen, José M. Entenza, Philippe Moreillon, M. P. Glauser, Reno Frei and H. Preston Holley. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Infection, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact