P. Gaud

437 citations
12 papers · 172 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

P. Gaud

12 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

P. Gaud
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 60
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 79
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 107
  • Electrochemistry 10
  • Condensed Matter Physics 16
Replace I. Polishchuk with:
I. Polishchuk United States
Pinhe Wang Denmark
Tae Hwan Jang South Korea
A.H. Montree Netherlands
Akihiro Otsuki Japan
A. Ghaffari Iran
Filip Schleicher Belgium
Luigia Lanni Sweden
Tsutomu Yatsuo Japan
Fanny Dahlquist Sweden
P. Gaud relative to I. Polishchuk United States I. Polishchuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
I. Polishchuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Gaud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Gaud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Gaud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Gaud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Gaud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Gaud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Gaud. The network helps show where P. Gaud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside P. Gaud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Gaud Line = papers co-authored together P. Gaud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 200451
2 200328
3 200426
4 200619
5 200212
6 19979
7 20057
8 20045
9 19945
10 20135
11 19954
12 19971

About P. Gaud

P. Gaud is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Networks and Communications, Condensed Matter Physics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 12 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (2 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (2 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (2 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (2 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (60 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (79 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (107 citations), Electrochemistry (10 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (16 citations). P. Gaud has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. Viala, Oriol T. Valls, M. Ledieu, O. Acher, M. Aïd, C. Dieppedale, Fabrice Lallemand, L. Ricq, J. Pagetti and Jérôme Delamare. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Microelectronic Engineering, Applied Surface Science, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems and Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact