P. Blüm

19.6k citations
75 papers · 918 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

P. Blüm

65 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers

P. Blüm
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 476
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 208
  • Radiation 91
  • Atmospheric Science 151
  • Computational Mechanics 122
Replace J. Scheer with:
J. Scheer Germany
C. Jordan United Kingdom
K. C. Hsieh United States
John J. Matese United States
E. T. Byram United States
Ludwig Oster United States
W. A. Stein United States
Leo Goldberg United States
H. Holweger Germany
B. C. Monsignori Fossi Italy
P. Blüm relative to J. Scheer Germany J. Scheer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
J. Scheer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Blüm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Blüm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Blüm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Blüm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Blüm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Blüm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Blüm. The network helps show where P. Blüm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Blüm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Blüm Line = papers co-authored together P. Blüm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
INTERACTION BETWEEN INTERSTELLAR HYDROGEN AND THE SOLAR WIND.
197099
2 197860
3 197758
4 197546
5 198836
6 198334
7
Solar wind latitudinal variations deduced from Mariner 10 interplanetary H (1216 Å) observations.
197934
8 197532
9 197630
10 197529
11 197728
12 196927
13 198023
14 198923
15 197722
16 197822
17 197820
18 197119
19 199918
20 198015

About P. Blüm

P. Blüm is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (30 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (17 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (16 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (14 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (11 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (8 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (6 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (476 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (208 citations), Radiation (91 citations), Atmospheric Science (151 citations) and Computational Mechanics (122 citations). P. Blüm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include H. J. Fahr, I. Harris, W. Husinsky, H. J. Fahr, J. M. Ajello, Norman F. Witt, D. A. Hammer, E. Benes, G. Backenstoss and H. Poth. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Planetary and Space Science, Advances in Space Research, Nature and The European Physical Journal A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact