Özlem Canöz

95 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Özlem Canöz
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Nephrology 111
  • Oral Surgery 56
  • Rheumatology 110
  • Oncology 190
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 118
Replace Afig Berdelı with:
Afig Berdelı Türkiye
Ruifang Lu China
M Ben-Bassat Israel
Nasreen A. Syed United States
S. Sakamoto Japan
Martin Jansen Austria
Alan M. Freedman United States
Ananth S. Murthy United States
Nicolas Delaleu Norway
An‐Hang Yang Taiwan
Özlem Canöz relative to Afig Berdelı Türkiye Afig Berdelı's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Afig Berdelı · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Özlem Canöz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Özlem Canöz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Özlem Canöz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Özlem Canöz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Özlem Canöz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Özlem Canöz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Özlem Canöz. The network helps show where Özlem Canöz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Özlem Canöz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Özlem Canöz Line = papers co-authored together Özlem Canöz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200789
2 200155
3 200751
4 200435
5
Melatonin promotes fracture healing in the rat model.
201033
6 201232
7 200430
8 200629
9 201028
10 200226
11 200922
12 201222
13 201521
14 200421
15 200420
16 201018
17 200617
18 200516
19 200816
20 200615

About Özlem Canöz

Özlem Canöz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 103 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (4 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (111 citations), Oral Surgery (56 citations), Rheumatology (110 citations), Oncology (190 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (118 citations). Özlem Canöz has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include Ercìhan Güney, Mehmet Gökhan Halıcı, L. Jeffrey Medeiros, Fahrı Bayram, Orhan G. Yigitbasi, George Z. Rassidakis, Figen Öztürk, Murat Hayri Sipahioğlu, Özlem Er and Eser Yıldırım Sözmen. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology and Industrial Health, Child s Nervous System, American Journal of Otolaryngology, American Journal of Hematology and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact