Otto Triffterer
Impact in
-
- International Law and Human Rights
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
- History top 10%
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Papers in
-
- International Law and Human Rights 7
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 3
- European Criminal Justice and Data Protection 3
- International Law and Aviation 2
- European and International Law Studies 2
- German Security and Defense Policies 1
-
- Criminal Law and Policy 2
- Co-authors
- Кай Амбос (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Leiden Journal of International Law (2 papers)Criminal Law Forum (1 paper)C.H.Beck eBooks (1 paper)Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (2 papers)Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustria
In The Last Decade
Otto Triffterer
10 papers receiving 41 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
- Political Science and International Relations 49
- History 13
- Law 6
- Sociology and Political Science 21
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 5
Countries citing papers authored by Otto Triffterer
This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Triffterer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Triffterer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Triffterer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Triffterer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Triffterer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Triffterer. The network helps show where Otto Triffterer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Otto Triffterer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 3 | Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Observers Notes, Article by Article | 2008 | 11 |
| 4 | Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court : a commentary | 2016 | 4 |
| 5 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 6 | Dogmatische Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des materiellen Völkerstrafrechts seit Nürnberg | 1966 | 1 |
| 7 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 9 | Prosecution of States for Crimes of State | 1996 | 1 |
| 10 | 1979 | 1 |
About Otto Triffterer
Otto Triffterer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 59 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (7 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (2 papers), International Law and Aviation (2 papers), European and International Law Studies (2 papers), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (1 paper) and German Security and Defense Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (49 citations), History (13 citations), Law (6 citations), Sociology and Political Science (21 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (5 citations). Otto Triffterer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Кай Амбос. Their work appears in journals such as Leiden Journal of International Law, Criminal Law Forum, C.H.Beck eBooks, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft and Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.