Omid Rezaei

36 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Omid Rezaei
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Epidemiology 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 36
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 12
  • Clinical Psychology 48
  • Pharmacology 35
Replace Phillip Oliver with:
Phillip Oliver United Kingdom
Marc Brodsky United States
Terrence T. Fitzgerald United States
Zahra Alammehrjerdi Australia
Daniel Gruener United States
Jessica Richardson United States
Linda Montanari Portugal
Judith Martin United States
Emily Little United States
Emilis Subata Lithuania
Omid Rezaei relative to Phillip Oliver United Kingdom Phillip Oliver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Phillip Oliver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Omid Rezaei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Omid Rezaei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Omid Rezaei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Omid Rezaei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Omid Rezaei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Omid Rezaei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Omid Rezaei. The network helps show where Omid Rezaei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Omid Rezaei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Omid Rezaei Line = papers co-authored together Omid Rezaei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201853
2 202032
3 201727
4 201726
5 200921
6 202021
7 201816
8 201714
9 202013
10 201213
11 201712
12 201211
13 201711
14 201810
15 20127
16 20187
17 20176
18 20125
19
Investigating the Attitude of Graduate Psychiatrists towards Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Conventional Clinical Interview Examination.
20144
20 20234

About Omid Rezaei

Omid Rezaei is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (92 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (36 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (48 citations) and Pharmacology (35 citations). Omid Rezaei has collaborated with scholars based in Iran, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bahram Armoon, Mehdi Noroozi, Alireza Noroozi, Hesam Ghiasvand, Faezeh Ghasemi, Mohammad Mohajeri, Seyed Mohammad Gheibi Hayat, AmirReza Hesari, Arrigo F.G. Cicero and Amirhossein Sahebkar. Their work appears in journals such as Neurological Research, Journal of Addictive Diseases, Drug and Alcohol Review, BMC Psychiatry and Journal of Cellular Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact