Oliver Freiberger
Impact in
- Religious studies top 5%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 7
- Chinese history and philosophy 5
- Religion, Society, and Development 2
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 8
- Religion, Theology, and Education 4
- Journals
- History of Religions (2 papers)Religions (1 paper)Numen (1 paper)The Journal of Religion (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Oliver Freiberger
20 papers receiving 102 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Religious studies 37
- Philosophy 50
- Classics 16
- Anthropology 27
- History 22
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Freiberger
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Freiberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Freiberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Freiberger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Freiberger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Freiberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Freiberger. The network helps show where Oliver Freiberger may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 4 | Religion in Asien? : Studien zur Anwendbarkeit des Religionsbegriffs | 2013 | 10 |
| 5 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 6 | The Buddhist Canon and the Canon of Buddhist Studies | 2004 | 7 |
| 7 | Geschichten und Geschichte : Historiographie und Hagiographie in der asiatischen Religionsgeschichte | 2010 | 7 |
| 8 | The disciplines of Buddhist Studies - Notes on religious commitment as boundary-marker | 2009 | 4 |
| 9 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 17 | Der Askesediskurs in der Religionsgeschichte: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung brahmanischer und fruhchristlicher Texte | 2009 | 2 |
| 18 | Zwischen Säkularismus und Hierokratie. Studien zum Verhältnis von Religion und Staat in Süd- und Ostasien | 2001 | 1 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Oliver Freiberger
Oliver Freiberger is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Philosophy, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), Religion, Theology, and Education (4 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (37 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Classics (16 citations), Anthropology (27 citations) and History (22 citations). Oliver Freiberger has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Their work appears in journals such as History of Religions, Religions, Numen, The Journal of Religion and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.