OECD eBooks (7 papers)Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
OECD
10 papers
receiving
2.3k citations
OECD's Hit Papers
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide2008 · 2.2k citations
What are hit papers?
Paper score: A paper's citations measured against the top-1% bar of its own field and year: the square root of citations ÷ bar, so 1 means right at the bar and 2 means four times its citations. The bar blends the citation counts that enter the top 1% of the paper's subfields in its year (weighted 89.5%), of those subfields over all years (0.5%) and of its year across all fields (10%); a subfield and year with fewer than 400 papers takes its year's bar. Papers from 2026 are not scored yet: in an unfinished year, when a paper appeared matters more than how it is cited.
Hit paper: A paper cited at least 1.5× the top-1% bar of its field and year: a paper score of at least √1.5.
2008OECD eBooks
Peers
OECD
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law277
Management Science and Operations Research257
General Energy21
Sociology and Political Science642
Economics and Econometrics294
Replace European Union with:
European Union
Markku LehtonenUnited Kingdom
José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade GuerraBrazil
This map shows the geographic impact of OECD's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by OECD with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OECD more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by OECD. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by OECD. The network helps show where OECD may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside OECD, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with OECDLine = papers co-authored togetherOECD links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
10 of 10 papers shown
#
Work
1
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide
OECD is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Strategy and Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Educational Policies and Reforms (5 papers), School Choice and Performance (1 paper), Quality of Life Measurement (1 paper), Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy (1 paper), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (1 paper), Global Education Systems and Policies (1 paper), Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (1 paper) and Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (277 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (257 citations), General Energy (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (642 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (294 citations). Frequent co-authors include European Union. Their work appears in journals such as OECD eBooks and Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.