O. Wing

65 papers receiving 746 citations

Peers

O. Wing
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Numerical Analysis 63
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 143
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 453
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 24
  • Biomedical Engineering 194
Replace W.M. Coughran with:
W.M. Coughran United States
Robert C. Melville United States
Kishore Singhal United States
Gabriel Kron United States
Chung-Wen Ho United States
F. H. Branin United States
P.A. Brennan United States
An‐Chang Deng United States
Tomomi Fujisawa Japan
Wolfgang M. Mathis Germany
O. Wing relative to W.M. Coughran United States W.M. Coughran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
W.M. Coughran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Wing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Wing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Wing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Wing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Wing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Wing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Wing. The network helps show where O. Wing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside O. Wing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Wing Line = papers co-authored together O. Wing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196796
2 198377
3 199140
4 196639
5 197939
6 199430
7 196729
8 198328
9 196426
10 197226
11 199225
12 200123
13 196722
14 198922
15 200021
16 199319
17 196118
18 195616
19 196715
20 199115

About O. Wing

O. Wing is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 71 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (19 papers), VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques (17 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (15 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (14 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Engineering and Technology Innovations (8 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (7 papers) and Interconnection Networks and Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (63 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (143 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (453 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (24 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (194 citations). O. Wing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include E.N. Protonotarios, Y. Tsividis, Yao‐Lin Jiang, G. H. Fisher, Colin C. McAndrew, Shuo Huang, Robert Tien-Wen Chien, Junfa Mao, Fung-Yuel Chang and Efthymios Housos. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, Journal of the Franklin Institute and IEEE Electron Device Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact