Nyla Ismail

18 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Nyla Ismail
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Emergency Medical Services 128
  • Insect Science 85
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 111
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Genetics 111
Replace Nina Bowens with:
Nina Bowens United States
Robert P. Ruggiero United States
Jonas Keiler Germany
Akihiko Fujita Japan
Cecil J. Saunders United States
Caiyun Zhu China
Joshua D. Groman United States
Hongying Cui China
Kenneth Z. McKenna United States
Kayvan Roayaie United States
Nyla Ismail relative to Nina Bowens United States Nina Bowens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Nina Bowens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nyla Ismail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nyla Ismail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nyla Ismail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nyla Ismail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nyla Ismail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nyla Ismail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nyla Ismail. The network helps show where Nyla Ismail may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nyla Ismail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nyla Ismail Line = papers co-authored together Nyla Ismail links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200582
2 200547
3 201045
4 200343
5 200837
6 201031
7 201224
8 200817
9 20129
10 20128
11 20107
12 20125
13 19985
14 20124
15 20174
16 20132
17 20112
18 20112

About Nyla Ismail

Nyla Ismail is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (9 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (128 citations), Insect Science (85 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (111 citations), Internal Medicine (17 citations) and Genetics (111 citations). Nyla Ismail has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Gene E. Robinson, Susan E. Fahrbach, Javier E. Anaya‐Ayala, Eric K. Peden, Mark G. Davies, Walter Wilczynski, Lainy B. Day, Charles W. Whitfield, Joseph J. Naoum and Michael J. Reardon. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Vascular Surgery, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Genes Brain & Behavior and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact