N.W. Thomas

875 citations
29 papers · 788 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

N.W. Thomas

29 papers receiving 740 citations

Peers

N.W. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmaceutical Science 302
  • Biomaterials 211
  • Urology 44
  • Paleontology 34
  • Immunology 48
Replace M. E. LeFevre with:
M. E. LeFevre United States
Martin Rosdy United States
Hongxia Lin South Korea
Qiqi Yu China
Monique Marchand-Arvier France
Dennis Moe Denmark
Janeli Viil Estonia
Birgit Johanna Teubl Austria
Michael Mezei Canada
Bart De Wever Belgium
N.W. Thomas relative to M. E. LeFevre United States M. E. LeFevre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17×
M. E. LeFevre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.W. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.W. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.W. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.W. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.W. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.W. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.W. Thomas. The network helps show where N.W. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.W. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.W. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together N.W. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982232
2 199590
3 199477
4
Particle uptake and translocation across epithelial membranes.
199643
5 198637
6 197030
7 198829
8 199526
9 197023
10 199423
11 197022
12 198016
13 199915
14 197314
15 198714
16 197513
17 197211
18
The blood supply of the islets of Langerhans in the Mongolian gerbil.
198311
19 19719
20 19809

About N.W. Thomas

N.W. Thomas is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Surgery, Rehabilitation, Urology and Paleontology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (10 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (10 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology (2 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), Digestive system and related health (2 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (2 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (302 citations), Biomaterials (211 citations), Urology (44 citations), Paleontology (34 citations) and Immunology (48 citations). N.W. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include S.S. Davis, S.S. Davis, C G Wilson, Lisbeth Ilium, Malcolm Frier, Ed C. Lavelle, Julie Holland, Kenneth Alan Howard, Derek T. O’Hagan and Lisbeth Illum. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Acta Zoologica, Cells Tissues Organs, Journal of Controlled Release and European Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact