Noelia Vállez

29 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Noelia Vállez
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Biophysics 49
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 144
  • Artificial Intelligence 189
  • Instrumentation 11
  • Media Technology 26
Replace LI Xiao-mei with:
LI Xiao-mei China
Nema Salem Saudi Arabia
Chenxi Xu China
Edwin Vans Fiji
Ahmad Ali Pakistan
Aadarsh Jha United States
Lingqiao Li China
Tri Huynh United States
Weijia Wu China
Noelia Vállez relative to LI Xiao-mei China LI Xiao-mei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
LI Xiao-mei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noelia Vállez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noelia Vállez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noelia Vállez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noelia Vállez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noelia Vállez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noelia Vállez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noelia Vállez. The network helps show where Noelia Vállez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noelia Vállez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noelia Vállez Line = papers co-authored together Noelia Vállez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201991
2 202137
3 201328
4 202024
5 202118
6 201716
7 201215
8 201415
9 202015
10 202214
11 202313
12 201813
13 202511
14 202211
15 202011
16 202110
17 201510
18 20109
19 20227
20 20204

About Noelia Vállez

Noelia Vállez is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biophysics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (9 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (3 papers) and Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (49 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (144 citations), Artificial Intelligence (189 citations), Instrumentation (11 citations) and Media Technology (26 citations). Noelia Vállez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Óscar Déniz, Gloria Bueno, Jesús Ruiz-Santaquiteria, Gabriel Cristóbal, Jesús Salido, Aníbal Pedraza, Carlos Pastor‐Vargas, Juan A. Álvarez-García, M. Milagro Fernández-Carrobles and José Luís Espinosa-Aranda. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Sensors, Neural Computing and Applications, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics and International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact