Noah Mitchell
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Topological Materials and Phenomena 5
-
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions 4
- Co-authors
- William T. M. Irvine (7 shared papers)Lisa M. Nash (4 shared papers)Evan D. Skillman (2 shared papers)Kristen B. W. McQuinn (2 shared papers)Sebastian J. Streichan (5 shared papers)Sylvia Ploeckinger (1 shared paper)Pavel Kroupa (1 shared paper)G. Hensler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature Methods (2 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)Nature Physics (2 papers)eLife (2 papers)Physical review. B. (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Noah Mitchell
20 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Instrumentation 22
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 66
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
- Condensed Matter Physics 37
Countries citing papers authored by Noah Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Mitchell. The network helps show where Noah Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 17 | Amorphous Gyroscopic Topological Metamaterials | 2016 | 1 |
| 18 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 1 |
About Noah Mitchell
Noah Mitchell is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Condensed Matter Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (5 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (3 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (3 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (22 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (66 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (37 citations). Noah Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Israel. Frequent co-authors include William T. M. Irvine, Lisa M. Nash, Evan D. Skillman, Kristen B. W. McQuinn, Sebastian J. Streichan, Sylvia Ploeckinger, Pavel Kroupa, G. Hensler, S. Recchi and Ari M. Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Methods, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Nature Physics, eLife and Physical review. B..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.