Nis Høst

1.5k citations
40 papers · 885 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Nis Høst

39 papers receiving 871 citations

Peers

Nis Høst
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 445
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 219
  • Surgery 118
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 45
  • Internal Medicine 7
Replace Eduard M. Laufer with:
Eduard M. Laufer Netherlands
Jonathan Beaudoin Canada
Paweł Rubiś Poland
M. B. Gravanis United States
Luc W.M. Eurlings Netherlands
Naoko Ishizuka Japan
William Bradham United States
Irwin K. Kline United States
Edgardo Bonacina Italy
Lucia Di Francesco Italy
Nis Høst relative to Eduard M. Laufer Netherlands Eduard M. Laufer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Eduard M. Laufer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nis Høst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nis Høst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nis Høst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nis Høst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nis Høst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nis Høst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nis Høst. The network helps show where Nis Høst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nis Høst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nis Høst Line = papers co-authored together Nis Høst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016131
2 200088
3 200881
4 199567
5 199762
6 201645
7 201645
8 201733
9 201632
10 201929
11 201327
12 201627
13 200122
14 202021
15 201818
16 199718
17 201516
18 201514
19 201713
20 202210

About Nis Høst

Nis Høst is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (445 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (219 citations), Surgery (118 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (45 citations) and Internal Medicine (7 citations). Nis Høst has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Egstrup, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Svend Eggert Jensen, Eva Prescott, Line Flytkjær Jensen, Marie Mide Michelsen, Adam Peña, Naja Dam Mygind, Jens Kastrup and Henrik Steen Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, International journal of cardiac imaging, American Heart Journal, PLoS ONE and Journal of the American Heart Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact