Nirupama Chandel

758 citations
24 papers · 616 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Nirupama Chandel

24 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Nirupama Chandel
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Nephrology 171
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 92
  • Virology 35
  • Transplantation 18
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 60
Replace Agnieszka Bińczak‐Kuleta with:
Agnieszka Bińczak‐Kuleta Poland
S Asano Japan
I G McFarlane United Kingdom
Deborah Kees‐Folts United States
Yona Kitay‐Cohen Israel
Shengyuan Luo United States
Katarzyna A. Stefanska Poland
Jalal Etemadi Iran
Joke van der Linden Netherlands
Antoney Ferrey United States
Nirupama Chandel relative to Agnieszka Bińczak‐Kuleta Poland Agnieszka Bińczak‐Kuleta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×
Agnieszka Bińczak‐Kuleta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nirupama Chandel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nirupama Chandel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nirupama Chandel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nirupama Chandel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nirupama Chandel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nirupama Chandel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nirupama Chandel. The network helps show where Nirupama Chandel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nirupama Chandel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nirupama Chandel Line = papers co-authored together Nirupama Chandel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201197
2 202196
3 201737
4 201334
5 200933
6 201829
7 201328
8 201327
9 201326
10 200925
11 201525
12 201925
13 201321
14 201420
15 201215
16 201315
17 201511
18 202011
19 201210
20 20108

About Nirupama Chandel

Nirupama Chandel is a scholar working on Nephrology, Virology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (8 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (2 papers) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (171 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (92 citations), Virology (35 citations), Transplantation (18 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (60 citations). Nirupama Chandel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Vivekanand Jha, Pravin C. Singhal, Ashwani Malhotra, Vivek Jain, Xiqian Lan, Mohammad Husain, Moin Ahson Saleem, Kamesh Ayasolla, Partab Rai and Pardeep Kumar Aggarwal. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Nephrology, Journal of Human Hypertension and Frontiers in Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact