Nina Lock

4.1k citations
78 papers · 3.5k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Nina Lock

76 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Nina Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1.1k
  • Materials Chemistry 2.5k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 667
  • Catalysis 269
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 612
Replace Thomas Gennett with:
Thomas Gennett United States
Andrew J. Logsdail United Kingdom
Edward G. Gillan United States
Heshmat Noei Germany
Xin Huang China
Stefan Maintz Germany
Gregorio Bottaro Italy
C.N.R. Rao India
F. Villain France
Adam F. Gross United States
Nina Lock relative to Thomas Gennett United States Thomas Gennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Thomas Gennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Lock. The network helps show where Nina Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Lock Line = papers co-authored together Nina Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008273
2 2010224
3 2017193
4 2012181
5 2006163
6 2018154
7 2020148
8 2013100
9 2019100
10 201399
11 201092
12 201292
13 201289
14 200788
15 201987
16 201483
17 201075
18 201974
19 201873
20 201369

About Nina Lock

Nina Lock is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 78 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (15 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (13 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (10 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (10 papers), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (9 papers), TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells (7 papers), Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity (7 papers) and Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (1.1k citations), Materials Chemistry (2.5k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (667 citations), Catalysis (269 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (612 citations). Nina Lock has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bo B. Iversen, Mogens Christensen, Kirsten M. Ø. Jensen, Cameron J. Kepert, Espen Drath Bøjesen, Vanessa K. Peterson, Yue Wu, Christoffer Tyrsted, Simon J. L. Billinge and Paolo Lamagni. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Nanoscale.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact