Nina Eberhardt

508 citations
16 papers · 246 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nina Eberhardt

14 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Nina Eberhardt
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 117
  • Parasitology 22
  • Microbiology 17
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 47
  • Radiation 20
Replace Karin Lecuona with:
Karin Lecuona South Africa
Najla Al-Harbi Saudi Arabia
Won Park South Korea
Timothy Best United States
Simonetta Bisanzi Italy
Alessandro Turra Italy
Anshuma Bansal India
William Mitchell United States
Brian Poirier United States
Y Kim South Korea
Nina Eberhardt relative to Karin Lecuona South Africa Karin Lecuona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Karin Lecuona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Eberhardt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Eberhardt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Eberhardt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Eberhardt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Eberhardt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Eberhardt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Eberhardt. The network helps show where Nina Eberhardt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Eberhardt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Eberhardt Line = papers co-authored together Nina Eberhardt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201858
2 201846
3 201821
4 202119
5 202118
6 202018
7 202116
8 202214
9 201810
10 20229
11 20229
12 20235
13 20212
14 20251
15 20250
16 20210

About Nina Eberhardt

Nina Eberhardt is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic infections in humans and animals (5 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (117 citations), Parasitology (22 citations), Microbiology (17 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (47 citations) and Radiation (20 citations). Nina Eberhardt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ambros J. Beer, Robert Tauber, Peter Kletting, Anne Thieme, Gerhard Glatting, Matthias Eiber, Calogero D’Alessandria, Meinrad Beer, Beate Grüner and Lynn Peters. Their work appears in journals such as Pathogens, Scientific Reports, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Cancers and Neurosurgical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact