Jan Coburger

60 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jan Coburger
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Genetics 540
  • Health Informatics 23
  • Neurology 106
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 194
  • Neurology 109
Replace Yae Won Park with:
Yae Won Park South Korea
Jiun‐Lin Yan Taiwan
Jared Pisapia United States
Christian F. Freyschlag Austria
Giuseppe La Rocca Italy
Seung Hong Choi South Korea
Anahita Fathi Kazerooni United States
Jacky T. Yeung United States
Xuzhu Chen China
Luke Macyszyn United States
Jan Coburger relative to Yae Won Park South Korea Yae Won Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
Yae Won Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Coburger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Coburger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Coburger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Coburger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Coburger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Coburger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Coburger. The network helps show where Jan Coburger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Coburger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Coburger Line = papers co-authored together Jan Coburger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014115
2 202299
3 201591
4 201348
5 201148
6 201544
7 201543
8 201240
9 201738
10 201838
11 201436
12 202433
13 201731
14 201629
15 201929
16 201729
17 201728
18 201825
19 201724
20 202023

About Jan Coburger

Jan Coburger is a scholar working on Genetics, Epidemiology, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (31 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (3 papers), Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects (3 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (540 citations), Health Informatics (23 citations), Neurology (106 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (194 citations) and Neurology (109 citations). Jan Coburger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Christian Rainer Wirtz, Ralph König, Michal Hlaváč, Angelika Scheuerle, Dietmar Rudolf Thal, Jens Engelke, Andrej Paľa, Mirjam Renovanz, Vincent Hagel and Franziska Mathis-Ullrich. Their work appears in journals such as World Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Review, Journal of neurosurgery, Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact