Nina Devlin
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 3
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
- Co-authors
- Ian Kelleher (6 shared papers)Mary Cannon (6 shared papers)Michelle Harley (4 shared papers)Mary Clarke (2 shared papers)Dearbhla Connor (1 shared paper)Carol Fitzpatrick (6 shared papers)Johanna T. W. Wigman (4 shared papers)Marco Sarchiapone (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychological Medicine (2 papers)Schizophrenia Research (1 paper)Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IrelandSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nina Devlin
8 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Nina Devlin's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Psychiatry and Mental health 674
- Clinical Psychology 429
- Biological Psychiatry 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 152
- Philosophy 92
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Devlin
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Devlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Devlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Devlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Devlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Devlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Devlin. The network helps show where Nina Devlin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nina Devlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prevalence of psychotic symptoms in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 504 |
| 2 | 2012 | 349 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 194 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 143 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 |
About Nina Devlin
Nina Devlin is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (674 citations), Clinical Psychology (429 citations), Biological Psychiatry (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (152 citations) and Philosophy (92 citations). Nina Devlin has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Kelleher, Mary Cannon, Michelle Harley, Mary Clarke, Dearbhla Connor, Carol Fitzpatrick, Johanna T. W. Wigman, Marco Sarchiapone, Camilla Wasserman and Vladimir Carli. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Schizophrenia Research, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.