Nilima Nigam

52 papers receiving 966 citations

Peers

Nilima Nigam
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 161
  • Mathematical Physics 67
  • Computational Mechanics 144
  • Numerical Analysis 33
  • Modeling and Simulation 26
Replace Václav Klika with:
Václav Klika Czechia
Lewis Wheeler United States
Jürgen Geiser Germany
R. J. Atkin United Kingdom
Ricardo Ruíz-Baier Chile
Zbisław Tabor Poland
Wayne Kreider United States
Martin Seebaß Germany
David M. McQueen United States
Jean‐Paul Pelteret Germany
Nilima Nigam relative to Václav Klika Czechia Václav Klika's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Václav Klika · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nilima Nigam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nilima Nigam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nilima Nigam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nilima Nigam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nilima Nigam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nilima Nigam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nilima Nigam. The network helps show where Nilima Nigam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nilima Nigam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nilima Nigam Line = papers co-authored together Nilima Nigam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015192
2 200887
3 200263
4 201045
5 200541
6 200839
7 201139
8 201539
9
200538
10 202038
11 200333
12 201526
13 201425
14 201124
15 202024
16 201823
17 201821
18 201121
19 200619
20 201119

About Nilima Nigam

Nilima Nigam is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (12 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (10 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (10 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (9 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (8 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (7 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (6 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (161 citations), Mathematical Physics (67 citations), Computational Mechanics (144 citations), Numerical Analysis (33 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (26 citations). Nilima Nigam has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James M. Wakeling, Hadi Rahemi, Svetlana V. Komarova, Marc D. Ryser, Debra Lewis, David P. Nicholls, Stephanie A. Ross, Joel Phillips, George C. Hsiao and R. K. N. D. Rajapakse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, Frontiers in Physiology, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Computers & Mathematics with Applications and Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact