Nikolas Feith Tan

600 citations
24 papers · 276 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nikolas Feith Tan

22 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Nikolas Feith Tan
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 224
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Political Science and International Relations 100
  • Health 13
  • Law 17
Replace Rebecca Hamlin with:
Rebecca Hamlin United States
Federica Infantino Belgium
Olga Jubany Spain
Daniel Ghezelbash Australia
Jon Burnett United Kingdom
Tom K. Wong United States
Helge Schwiertz Germany
Arthur C. Helton United States
Giuseppe Campesi Italy
Ferruccio Pastore Italy
Nikolas Feith Tan relative to Rebecca Hamlin United States Rebecca Hamlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rebecca Hamlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikolas Feith Tan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolas Feith Tan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolas Feith Tan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolas Feith Tan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolas Feith Tan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolas Feith Tan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolas Feith Tan. The network helps show where Nikolas Feith Tan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Nikolas Feith Tan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikolas Feith Tan Line = papers co-authored together Nikolas Feith Tan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201795
2 201734
3 201628
4 202217
5 202016
6 202012
7 202110
8 202110
9 202010
10 20238
11 20226
12 20256
13 20184
14 20204
15 20204
16 20233
17
Beyond the Deterrence Paradigm in Global Refugee Policy
20162
18 20152
19
Comparing Cooperation on Migration Control: Italy–Libya and Australia–Indonesia
20171
20 20221

About Nikolas Feith Tan

Nikolas Feith Tan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health and History, having authored 24 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (9 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers) and Global Security and Public Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (224 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations), Political Science and International Relations (100 citations), Health (13 citations) and Law (17 citations). Nikolas Feith Tan has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Gammeltoft‐Hansen, Daniel Ghezelbash, Marie Juul Petersen, David Cantor, Mariana Valverde, Jeff Handmaker, Radhika Mongia, Moritz Baumgärtel, Stephen Phillips and Annick Pijnenburg. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Refugee Law, Nordic Journal of International Law, European Journal of Migration and Law, German Law Journal and International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact