Nikolas Feith Tan

614 citations
25 papers · 328 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nikolas Feith Tan

22 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Nikolas Feith Tan
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 252
  • Clinical Psychology 104
  • Political Science and International Relations 122
  • Development 15
  • Law 18
Replace Daniel Ghezelbash with:
Daniel Ghezelbash Australia
Rebecca Hamlin United States
Ferruccio Pastore Italy
Arthur C. Helton United States
Helge Schwiertz Germany
Tom K. Wong United States
Bill Frelick United Kingdom
Saime Özçürümez Türkiye
Lena Laube Germany
Luigi Achilli Italy
Nikolas Feith Tan relative to Daniel Ghezelbash Australia Daniel Ghezelbash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Daniel Ghezelbash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikolas Feith Tan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolas Feith Tan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolas Feith Tan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolas Feith Tan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolas Feith Tan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolas Feith Tan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolas Feith Tan. The network helps show where Nikolas Feith Tan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Nikolas Feith Tan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikolas Feith Tan Line = papers co-authored together Nikolas Feith Tan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017119
2 201740
3 201633
4 202222
5 202018
6 202013
7 202113
8 202111
9 202010
10 20239
11 20217
12 20256
13 20226
14 20185
15 20223
16 20233
17 20222
18
Beyond the Deterrence Paradigm in Global Refugee Policy
20162
19 20242
20 20152

About Nikolas Feith Tan

Nikolas Feith Tan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health and History, having authored 25 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (11 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (7 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (2 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (252 citations), Clinical Psychology (104 citations), Political Science and International Relations (122 citations), Development (15 citations) and Law (18 citations). Nikolas Feith Tan has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Gammeltoft‐Hansen, Daniel Ghezelbash, Marie Juul Petersen, Stephen Phillips, Annick Pijnenburg, David James Cantor, Moritz Baumgärtel, Liette Gilbert, Mariana Valverde and David Cantor. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Refugee Law, European Journal of Migration and Law, Nordic Journal of International Law, German Law Journal and International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact