Nigussie Dechassa
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigussie Dechassa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigussie Dechassa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigussie Dechassa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nigussie Dechassa. Nigussie Dechassa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nigussie Dechassa
67 papers receiving 901 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Nigussie Dechassa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigussie Dechassa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigussie Dechassa. The network helps show where Nigussie Dechassa may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Nigussie Dechassa
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigussie Dechassa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigussie Dechassa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigussie Dechassa more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.