Nigel Stepp

719 citations
19 papers · 546 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nigel Stepp

19 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Nigel Stepp
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 429
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • Social Psychology 129
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 77
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 24
Replace A. Fuchs with:
A. Fuchs United States
Hiroyuki Iizuka Japan
Gonzalo C. de Guzman United States
Thomas L. Thornton United States
Dionysios Perdikis Germany
G. C. deGuzman United States
Loïc Lemoine France
Lancelot Da Costa United Kingdom
Björn Kralemann Germany
Vicente Raja Canada
Nigel Stepp relative to A. Fuchs United States A. Fuchs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
A. Fuchs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Stepp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Stepp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Stepp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Stepp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Stepp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Stepp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Stepp. The network helps show where Nigel Stepp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Stepp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nigel Stepp Line = papers co-authored together Nigel Stepp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009156
2 200892
3 201176
4 201551
5 200943
6 201619
7 201919
8 201518
9 201715
10 201013
11 200811
12 201511
13 20098
14 20165
15 20193
16
Anticipatory synchronization in artificial agents
20172
17 20192
18 20191
19
Emergence of Anticipation at Multiple Time Scales
20121

About Nigel Stepp

Nigel Stepp is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (3 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (429 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Social Psychology (129 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (77 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (24 citations). Nigel Stepp has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. T. Turvey, Anthony Chemero, Damian G. Kelty‐Stephen, James A. Dixon, Narayan Srinivasa, Dietmar Plenz, Henning U. Voss, Jose Cruz-Albrecht, Maurice Lamb and Miguel Galeote. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, PLoS Computational Biology and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact