Nigel D. Stepp

714 citations
18 papers · 565 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nigel D. Stepp

18 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Nigel D. Stepp
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 354
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 37
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 63
  • Social Psychology 111
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
Replace Vicente Raja with:
Vicente Raja Canada
Пицик Елена Николаевна Russia
Luca Ambrogioni Netherlands
Michael L. Anderson United States
Domenico Parisi Italy
Piotr Słowiński United Kingdom
Beren Millidge United Kingdom
Rudolf A. Rasch Netherlands
Deborah J. Aks United States
Nigel D. Stepp relative to Vicente Raja Canada Vicente Raja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Vicente Raja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel D. Stepp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel D. Stepp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel D. Stepp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel D. Stepp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel D. Stepp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel D. Stepp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel D. Stepp. The network helps show where Nigel D. Stepp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Nigel D. Stepp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nigel D. Stepp Line = papers co-authored together Nigel D. Stepp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2009162
2 200895
3 201176
4 201561
5 200943
6 201619
7 201518
8 201918
9 201715
10 201014
11 201512
12 200811
13 20098
14 20165
15 20193
16
Anticipatory synchronization in artificial agents
20172
17 20192
18 20191

About Nigel D. Stepp

Nigel D. Stepp is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Social Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 18 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (5 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (4 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and User Authentication and Security Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (354 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (37 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (63 citations), Social Psychology (111 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations). Nigel D. Stepp has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael T. Turvey, Narayan Srinivasa, Anthony P. Chemero, James A. Dixon, Damian G. Kelty‐Stephen, Dietmar Plenz, Henning U. Voss, Jose Cruz-Albrecht, T.D. Frank and Michael J. Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, The European Physical Journal B, Journal of Computational Neuroscience and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact