Niels Bugert
Impact in
-
- Quality and Supply Management
- Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Papers in
-
- Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management 7
- Sustainable Supply Chain Management 5
-
- Quality and Supply Management 3
- Supply Chain and Inventory Management 2
- Big Data and Business Intelligence 1
- Journals
- Journal of Business Economics (1 paper)Computers & Industrial Engineering (1 paper)International Journal of Production Economics (1 paper)IFAC-PapersOnLine (1 paper)DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Niels Bugert
6 papers receiving 386 citations
Niels Bugert's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Management Information Systems 192
- Strategy and Management 312
- Business and International Management 12
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 62
- Information Systems 117
Countries citing papers authored by Niels Bugert
This map shows the geographic impact of Niels Bugert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niels Bugert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niels Bugert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Niels Bugert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niels Bugert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niels Bugert. The network helps show where Niels Bugert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Niels Bugert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 335 |
| 2 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 0 |
About Niels Bugert
Niels Bugert is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Insect Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (7 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (5 papers), Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (1 paper) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (192 citations), Strategy and Management (312 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (62 citations) and Information Systems (117 citations). Niels Bugert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Lasch and Jacob Lohmer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Economics, Computers & Industrial Engineering, International Journal of Production Economics, IFAC-PapersOnLine and DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.