Nicole Kosanke

546 citations
12 papers · 447 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nicole Kosanke

12 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Nicole Kosanke
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 184
  • Clinical Psychology 150
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
  • Epidemiology 212
  • Applied Psychology 30
Replace Paul M. Constable with:
Paul M. Constable Australia
Dara A. Charney Canada
Donna M. LaPaglia United States
R D Weiss United States
Edgar P. Nace United States
R Vraşti India
Christophe Huỳnh Canada
Leslie Malchy Canada
Daneyal Mahmood United States
Alfredo Sbrana Italy
Nicole Kosanke relative to Paul M. Constable Australia Paul M. Constable's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Paul M. Constable · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicole Kosanke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole Kosanke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole Kosanke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole Kosanke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole Kosanke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole Kosanke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole Kosanke. The network helps show where Nicole Kosanke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nicole Kosanke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicole Kosanke Line = papers co-authored together Nicole Kosanke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2001103
2 200598
3
Predictive validity of the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for naturalistically matched vs. mismatched alcoholism patients.
200446
4 200541
5 200336
6 200325
7 200322
8 200518
9 200517
10 200516
11 200213
12 200412

About Nicole Kosanke

Nicole Kosanke is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (184 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (83 citations), Epidemiology (212 citations) and Applied Psychology (30 citations). Nicole Kosanke has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Foote, Stephen Magura, Andrew Rosenblum, Graham L. Staines, Charles M. Cleland, Daneyal Mahmood and Chunki Fong. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, American Journal on Addictions, Journal of Addictive Diseases, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact