Nicolás Devaud

700 citations
19 papers · 478 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nicolás Devaud

17 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

Nicolás Devaud
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Gastroenterology 58
  • Hepatology 51
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 178
  • Surgery 226
  • Transplantation 7
Replace Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia with:
Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia United States
Hosam Hamed Egypt
Neil Bhogal United States
Toru Obuchi Japan
Dong‐Won Ahn South Korea
Guowei Kim Singapore
Franky Vansteenkiste Belgium
H Obertop Netherlands
Ernest Bombuy Spain
Andrei Cocieru United States
Nicolás Devaud relative to Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia United States Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolás Devaud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolás Devaud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolás Devaud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolás Devaud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolás Devaud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolás Devaud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolás Devaud. The network helps show where Nicolás Devaud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolás Devaud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolás Devaud Line = papers co-authored together Nicolás Devaud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009145
2 200773
3 200764
4 200731
5 200927
6 201325
7 200824
8 202223
9 201317
10 200613
11 20209
12 20188
13 20236
14 20226
15 20074
16 20212
17 20201
18 20180
19 20210

About Nicolás Devaud

Nicolás Devaud is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Hepatology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (2 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (2 papers) and Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (58 citations), Hepatology (51 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (178 citations), Surgery (226 citations) and Transplantation (7 citations). Nicolás Devaud has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vivian E. Strong, Camilo Boza, Daniel G. Coit, Peter J. Allen, Murray F. Brennan, Mithat Gönen, Gustavo Pérez, Alex Escalona, Luis Ibáñez and Sergio Guzmán. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases and Gastric Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact