Nick Weiss

20 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Nick Weiss
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Health Informatics 30
  • Biophysics 57
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 146
  • Artificial Intelligence 197
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 119
Replace Rob van de Loo with:
Rob van de Loo Netherlands
Kyunghyun Paeng South Korea
Zhaoxuan Ma United States
Mostafa Jahanifar United Kingdom
Ozan Ciga Canada
Monjoy Saha United States
Tianhao Zhao China
Quirine F. Manson Netherlands
Pingjun Chen United States
Navid Alemi Koohbanani United Kingdom
Nick Weiss relative to Rob van de Loo Netherlands Rob van de Loo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rob van de Loo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Weiss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Weiss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Weiss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Weiss. The network helps show where Nick Weiss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Weiss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Weiss Line = papers co-authored together Nick Weiss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019109
2 201369
3 201859
4 202127
5 202127
6 202125
7 201820
8 202212
9 201711
10 202211
11 20239
12 20188
13 20217
14 20226
15 20215
16 20154
17 20222
18 20222
19 20251
20 20231

About Nick Weiss

Nick Weiss is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Health Informatics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (10 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (30 citations), Biophysics (57 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (146 citations), Artificial Intelligence (197 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (119 citations). Nick Weiss has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Lotz, Anil Rao, Daniel Rueckert, André Homeyer, Jeroen van der Laak, Rob van de Loo, Horst K. Hahn, Geert Litjens, Wouter Bulten and Péter Bándi. Their work appears in journals such as Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Journal of Pathology Informatics, Diagnostic Pathology, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine and Disease Models & Mechanisms.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact