Nick Van Reet

36 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Nick Van Reet
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Parasitology 154
  • Epidemiology 474
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 338
  • Insect Science 89
  • Small Animals 45
Replace Sara Lopes dos Santos with:
Sara Lopes dos Santos Brazil
Fábio Mitsuo Lima Brazil
Cristina Poveda United States
C. A. Ross United Kingdom
Virginia Iniesta Spain
Gabriela F Rodrigues-Luiz Brazil
Valeria Tekiel Argentina
Frédéric Bringaud France
Tiago D. Serafim United States
A. M. RUIZ Argentina
Nick Van Reet relative to Sara Lopes dos Santos Brazil Sara Lopes dos Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Sara Lopes dos Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Van Reet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Van Reet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Van Reet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Van Reet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Van Reet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Van Reet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Van Reet. The network helps show where Nick Van Reet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Van Reet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Van Reet Line = papers co-authored together Nick Van Reet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200971
2 200954
3 201652
4 201946
5 200937
6 201734
7 201430
8 201726
9 201121
10 201319
11 201418
12 201816
13 201715
14 201114
15 201614
16 201413
17 202013
18 202012
19 201610
20 201510

About Nick Van Reet

Nick Van Reet is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science, Parasitology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 37 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (35 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (27 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (7 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (7 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (7 papers), Helminth infection and control (4 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (154 citations), Epidemiology (474 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (338 citations), Insect Science (89 citations) and Small Animals (45 citations). Nick Van Reet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Büscher, Bruno Goddeeris, Filip Claes, Birhanu Hadush, Théo Baltz, Suman K. Vodnala, Martı́n E. Rottenberg, Dieudonné Mumba Ngoyi, Nathalie Boucher and Laurent Hébert. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Veterinary Parasitology, Parasites & Vectors and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact