Nick Smith
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Emotions and Moral Behavior
Papers in
-
- Forgiveness and Related Behaviors 9
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 2
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 1
- Co-authors
- N. Ángel Pinillos (1 shared paper)Ken Czerwinski (1 shared paper)Stefan Sobolowski (1 shared paper)Cesar J. Rebellon (1 shared paper)Chris R. Colocousis (1 shared paper)Nicole E. Negowetti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Separation Science and Technology (1 paper)Philosophia (1 paper)Radical philosophy (1 paper)New Criminal Law Review (1 paper)Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Nick Smith
17 papers receiving 204 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Social Psychology 114
- General Decision Sciences 7
- Philosophy 37
- Cognitive Neuroscience 50
- Sociology and Political Science 108
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Smith. The network helps show where Nick Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nick Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I was wrong | 2008 | 65 |
| 2 | 2001 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 11 | Why Hardcore Goes Soft: Adorno, Japanese Noise, and the Extirpation of Dissonance | 2008 | 2 |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | The Spirit of Modernity and its Fate: Jürgen Habermas | 1992 | 1 |
| 14 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | Apologies and Fitness to Practice Law: A Practical Framework for Evaluating Remorse in the Bar Admission Process | 2011 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 20 | Just Apologies: An Overview of the Philosophical Issues | 2013 | 0 |
About Nick Smith
Nick Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (9 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (114 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations), Philosophy (37 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (108 citations). Nick Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include N. Ángel Pinillos, Ken Czerwinski, Stefan Sobolowski, Cesar J. Rebellon, Chris R. Colocousis and Nicole E. Negowetti. Their work appears in journals such as Separation Science and Technology, Philosophia, Radical philosophy, New Criminal Law Review and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.