Nick Smith
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Philosophy top 10%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
-
- Forgiveness and Related Behaviors 11
-
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 2
- Co-authors
- N. Ángel Pinillos (1 shared paper)Peter Marchetto (1 shared paper)Ken Czerwinski (1 shared paper)Cesar J. Rebellon (1 shared paper)Stefan Sobolowski (1 shared paper)Chris R. Colocousis (1 shared paper)Nicole E. Negowetti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Criminal Law Review (1 paper)Radical philosophy (1 paper)Mind & Language (1 paper)Separation Science and Technology (1 paper)Philosophia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayCanada
In The Last Decade
Nick Smith
21 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Social Psychology 126
- Philosophy 39
- General Decision Sciences 6
- Cognitive Neuroscience 58
- Sociology and Political Science 125
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Smith. The network helps show where Nick Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nick Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 73 | |
| 2 | I was wrong | 2008 | 71 |
| 3 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | Why Hardcore Goes Soft: Adorno, Japanese Noise, and the Extirpation of Dissonance | 2008 | 2 |
| 14 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 16 | The Spirit of Modernity and its Fate: Jürgen Habermas | 1992 | 1 |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 1 |
About Nick Smith
Nick Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 26 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (126 citations), Philosophy (39 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (58 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (125 citations). Nick Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Frequent co-authors include N. Ángel Pinillos, Peter Marchetto, Ken Czerwinski, Cesar J. Rebellon, Stefan Sobolowski, Chris R. Colocousis and Nicole E. Negowetti. Their work appears in journals such as New Criminal Law Review, Radical philosophy, Mind & Language, Separation Science and Technology and Philosophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.