Nick L. Schultz

27 papers receiving 564 citations

Nick L. Schultz's Hit Papers

Global impoverishment of natural vegetation revealed by dark diversity 2025 · 21 citations
210Years since publication5101520

Peers

Nick L. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 325
  • Forestry 56
  • Ecological Modeling 52
  • Ecology 259
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 96
Replace Amgaa Batbaatar with:
Amgaa Batbaatar Canada
Christiane Koch Germany
Szilárd Szentes Hungary
Andrew Wannenburgh South Africa
Melanie Köbel Portugal
Margot Neyret Germany
Mohammad Farzam Iran
Megan E. Lulow United States
Shaily Menon United States
Emiliano Quiroga Argentina
Nick L. Schultz relative to Amgaa Batbaatar Canada Amgaa Batbaatar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24×
Amgaa Batbaatar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick L. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick L. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick L. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick L. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick L. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick L. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick L. Schultz. The network helps show where Nick L. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick L. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick L. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Nick L. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018201
2 201078
3 201932
4 201931
5 202024
6 202523
7
Global impoverishment of natural vegetation revealed by dark diversity
Hit paper breakdown →
202521
8 202019
9 201419
10 201919
11 202316
12 202215
13 201711
14 201311
15 201911
16
Using Text-Messaging in the Secondary Classroom
20098
17 20167
18 20147
19 20246
20 20225

About Nick L. Schultz

Nick L. Schultz is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Forestry, Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Pollution, having authored 30 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (325 citations), Forestry (56 citations), Ecological Modeling (52 citations), Ecology (259 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (96 citations). Nick L. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include John W. Morgan, Ian D. Lunt, Megan Good, Simon D. Cook, Wolfgang Lewandrowski, Nick C. H. Reid, Jodi N. Price, John T. Hunter, G. M. Lodge and Ian R. K. Sluiter. Their work appears in journals such as Austral Ecology, Restoration Ecology, Ecology and Evolution, Applied Vegetation Science and Insectes Sociaux.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact