Nick Gill

2.1k citations
49 papers · 1.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Gill

48 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Nick Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Sociology and Political Science 993
  • Geography, Planning and Development 87
  • Clinical Psychology 282
  • General Health Professions 267
  • Urban Studies 70
Replace Dominique Moran with:
Dominique Moran United Kingdom
Martina Tazzioli United Kingdom
Lorenzo Veracini Australia
Nick Vaughan‐Williams United Kingdom
Vicki Squire United Kingdom
Suzan Ilcan Canada
Jenny Edkins United Kingdom
Reece Jones United States
Jonathan Darling United Kingdom
Audra Simpson United States
Nick Gill relative to Dominique Moran United Kingdom Dominique Moran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dominique Moran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Gill. The network helps show where Nick Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Gill Line = papers co-authored together Nick Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016113
2 201796
3 201494
4 201565
5 201161
6 201157
7 201851
8 201650
9 201547
10
Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention
201347
11 201046
12 201845
13 201340
14
Nothing Personal?: Geographies of Governing and Activism in the British Asylum System
201540
15 201135
16 201335
17 201229
18 202028
19 201425
20 201825

About Nick Gill

Nick Gill is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Demography, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (25 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (9 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (3 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (993 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (87 citations), Clinical Psychology (282 citations), General Health Professions (267 citations) and Urban Studies (70 citations). Nick Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Burridge, Deirdre Conlon, Dominique Moran, Anthony Good, Austin Kocher, Lauren Martin, Victoria Mason, Imogen Tyler, Ceri Oeppen and Alex Jeffrey. Their work appears in journals such as Political Geography, Antipode, Geoforum, Geography Compass and Mobilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact