Nick Bishop

126 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Nick Bishop's Hit Papers

Osteogenesis imperfecta 2017 · 518 citations
5180+3+6Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Nick Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.1k
  • Rheumatology 545
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 585
  • Genetics 1.0k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 536
Replace Nicholas Bishop with:
Nicholas Bishop United Kingdom
Craig F. Munns Australia
Jonathan H. Tobias United Kingdom
Wolfgang Högler United Kingdom
Tim Cundy New Zealand
William H. McAlister United States
Outi Mäkitie Finland
N. Loveridge United Kingdom
Anne Pernille Hermann Denmark
Annemieke M. Boot Netherlands
Nick Bishop relative to Nicholas Bishop United Kingdom Nicholas Bishop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Nicholas Bishop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Bishop. The network helps show where Nick Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Nick Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Osteogenesis imperfecta
Hit paper breakdown →
2017518
2 2007275
3 2003215
4 2014199
5 2011180
6 2003170
7 2019130
8 2009128
9 1989123
10 2009112
11 2006111
12 1999110
13 1999110
14 2002109
15 1992101
16 201798
17 200496
18 200893
19 199390
20 200087

About Nick Bishop

Nick Bishop is a scholar working on Genetics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 132 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (29 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (29 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (18 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (16 papers), Bone health and treatments (9 papers), Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies (9 papers), Bone and Dental Protein Studies (8 papers) and Hip disorders and treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.1k citations), Rheumatology (545 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (585 citations), Genetics (1.0k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (536 citations). Nick Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Paul Dimitri, Alan Lucas, B A Wharton, Jennifer Walsh, Cyrus Cooper, Tjeerd van Staa, Richard Eastell, J K Wales, F. King and Paul Arundel. Their work appears in journals such as Bone, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Osteoporosis International and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact