Nicholas Williams

401 citations
36 papers · 204 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Williams

29 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Nicholas Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 31
  • Statistics and Probability 30
  • Health Informatics 2
  • Reproductive Medicine 10
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 5
Replace Mariia Samoilenko with:
Mariia Samoilenko Canada
Xiu‐Qing Yao China
Taddele Kibret Canada
Julie Barberio United States
Turki A. Althunian Saudi Arabia
Yinjuan Lian United States
Pam James United Kingdom
Kerstine Carter United States
Catrin Wessman Sweden
Peta Heslop United Kingdom
Nicholas Williams relative to Mariia Samoilenko Canada Mariia Samoilenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Mariia Samoilenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Williams. The network helps show where Nicholas Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Williams Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202226
2 200622
3 202113
4 202412
5 202112
6 202112
7 202211
8 202210
9 20208
10 20227
11 20207
12 20247
13 20206
14 20206
15 20226
16 20235
17 20215
18 20244
19 20204
20 20253

About Nicholas Williams

Nicholas Williams is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (7 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (31 citations), Statistics and Probability (30 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations), Reproductive Medicine (10 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (5 citations). Nicholas Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Iván Díaz, Kara E. Rudolph, Matthew S. Conti, Scott J. Ellis, Di Pan, Edward J. Schenck, William Whalen, Michael J. Satlin, Jonathan Day and Mark C. Drakos. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Addiction, Journal of Pain Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact