Nicholas Silver

50 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Nicholas Silver
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 520
  • Neurology 145
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 256
  • Neurology 95
Replace Francesco Federico with:
Francesco Federico Italy
Emanuele Tinelli Italy
Erich Scholz Germany
Sara Shams Sweden
Eduard L. E. M. Bollen Netherlands
Shin Chien Beh United States
W. Pöllmann Germany
Bénédicte Maréchal Switzerland
Jan Krásenský Czechia
Jamshid Lotfi Iran
Nicholas Silver relative to Francesco Federico Italy Francesco Federico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Francesco Federico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Silver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Silver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Silver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Silver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Silver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Silver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Silver. The network helps show where Nicholas Silver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Silver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Silver Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Silver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015221
2 2017154
3 1997147
4 200399
5 201995
6 199893
7 199792
8 199989
9 199785
10 200379
11 200177
12 200166
13 200164
14 199752
15 199951
16 202149
17 199948
18
Single-dose gadolinium with magnetization transfer versus triple-dose gadolinium in the MR detection of multiple sclerosis lesions.
199744
19 200543
20 199641

About Nicholas Silver

Nicholas Silver is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Hematology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (26 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (15 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (520 citations), Neurology (145 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (256 citations) and Neurology (95 citations). Nicholas Silver has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David H. Miller, Gareth J. Barker, Alan J. Thompson, Paul S. Tofts, Charly Gaul, Eric J. Liebler, DH Miller, Hans‐Christoph Diener, Andreas Straube and David G. MacManus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology, The Journal of Headache and Pain, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Cephalalgia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact