Nicholas Lees

29 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Nicholas Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Business and International Management 21
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 12
  • Strategy and Management 53
  • Animal Science and Zoology 32
  • Information Systems and Management 20
Replace Giorgia Bucci with:
Giorgia Bucci Italy
Kate Clancy United States
Bradley J. Rickard United States
Georgina Holt United Kingdom
Eko Ruddy Cahyadi Indonesia
Erpeng Wang China
Dian Zhu China
Aaron Adalja United States
Steve Martinez United States
Deepananda Herath Canada
Nicholas Lees relative to Giorgia Bucci Italy Giorgia Bucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Giorgia Bucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Lees. The network helps show where Nicholas Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Lees Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202064
2 201642
3 201731
4 202128
5 202019
6 201717
7 201410
8 20128
9 20227
10 20157
11 20115
12 20155
13 20214
14 20214
15 20154
16 20143
17 20142
18 20112
19 20162
20 20242

About Nicholas Lees

Nicholas Lees is a scholar working on Surgery, Strategy and Management, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Plant Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (5 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (5 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (21 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (12 citations), Strategy and Management (53 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (32 citations) and Information Systems and Management (20 citations). Nicholas Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mary Dixon‐Woods, Graham Martin, Emma L. Jones, Peter L. Nuthall, Caroline M. Saunders, Mark M. J. Wilson, Stefano Pascucci, Jacques Trienekens, J. H. Mackay and Sarah Powell. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Life, Clinical Medicine and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact