Nicholas Devaney

67 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Nicholas Devaney
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Instrumentation 57
  • Ophthalmology 111
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 370
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 112
  • Biomedical Engineering 224
Replace Mette Owner-Petersen with:
Mette Owner-Petersen Sweden
Vidal F. Canales Spain
Julia W. Evans United States
Néstor Uribe‐Patarroyo United States
Hao Xian China
Weiyao Zou United States
José Manuel Rodríguez-Ramos Spain
José E. Oti Spain
Stefan Goelz Germany
Aurélie Montmerle-Bonnefois France
Nicholas Devaney relative to Mette Owner-Petersen Sweden Mette Owner-Petersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Mette Owner-Petersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Devaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Devaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Devaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Devaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Devaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Devaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Devaney. The network helps show where Nicholas Devaney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Devaney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Devaney Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Devaney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201290
2 201068
3 200634
4 201733
5 200831
6 200225
7 201323
8 201520
9 200319
10 200817
11 200716
12 200715
13 200414
14 201814
15 200313
16 200413
17 200613
18 201612
19 201612
20 201411

About Nicholas Devaney

Nicholas Devaney is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Instrumentation, having authored 74 papers that have together received 675 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (52 papers), Advanced optical system design (20 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (17 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (17 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (57 citations), Ophthalmology (111 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (370 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (112 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (224 citations). Nicholas Devaney has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marco Lombardo, Giuseppe Lombardo, Chris Dainty, Daniel Burke, Alexander V. Goncharov, Sebastiano Serrao, Mariacristina Parravano, Kevin Murphy, Harrison H. Barrett and Christopher Dainty. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Biomedical Optics Express and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact