Nicholas Baker
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Aging top 10%
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 9
- Face Recognition and Perception 6
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 5
- Genetics 10
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 10
- Co-authors
- Philip J. Kellman (12 shared papers)Gro V. Amdam (10 shared papers)Gennady Erlikhman (5 shared papers)Hongjing Lu (5 shared papers)Ricarda Scheiner (1 shared paper)Kate E. Ihle (1 shared paper)Florian Wolschin (1 shared paper)James H. Elder (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (4 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (4 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Journal of Experimental Psychology General (3 papers)Experimental Gerontology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayCanada
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Baker
27 papers receiving 611 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Insect Science 204
- Aging 23
- Cognitive Neuroscience 166
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 171
- Genetics 215
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Baker. The network helps show where Nicholas Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 203 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 13 | Deep Convolutional Networks do not Perceive Illusory Contours. | 2018 | 11 |
| 14 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 4 |
About Nicholas Baker
Nicholas Baker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Geometry and Topology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (5 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (204 citations), Aging (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (166 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (171 citations) and Genetics (215 citations). Nicholas Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Philip J. Kellman, Gro V. Amdam, Gennady Erlikhman, Hongjing Lu, Ricarda Scheiner, Kate E. Ihle, Florian Wolschin, James H. Elder, Claus D. Kreibich and Ying Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Journal of Visualized Experiments, PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Experimental Gerontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.