Nicholas Bailey

546 citations
11 papers · 345 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Bailey

10 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Nicholas Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 127
  • Strategy and Management 224
  • Development 50
  • Accounting 75
  • Urban Studies 22
Replace Wan‐wen Chu with:
Wan‐wen Chu Taiwan
Kevin H. Zhang United States
Sunil Mani India
Henk L.M. Kox Netherlands
Emmanuel Cleeve United Kingdom
Johannes Petry United Kingdom
Rogério Studart United States
Asmund Rygh United Kingdom
Ryuhei Wakasugi Japan
Tyler Biggs United States
Nicholas Bailey relative to Wan‐wen Chu Taiwan Wan‐wen Chu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Wan‐wen Chu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Bailey. The network helps show where Nicholas Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Bailey Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2017164
2 202086
3 200338
4 201432
5 201813
6 20074
7
Motion as the Connection Between Audio and Visuals.
20062
8 20172
9 20182
10
Seafarer compensation claims
20032
11 20250

About Nicholas Bailey

Nicholas Bailey is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 11 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (2 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), International Law and Aviation (1 paper), Architecture and Computational Design (1 paper) and Art, Technology, and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (127 citations), Strategy and Management (224 citations), Development (50 citations), Accounting (75 citations) and Urban Studies (22 citations). Nicholas Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Dylan Sutherland, John Anderson, Ilan Alon and Sali Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Management, International Business Review, Journal of Public Affairs, Research in International Business and Finance and Journal of International Business Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact